Class #27: Tuesday May 8, 2018

In this class the students were asked to read and analyze film reviews. I think this was a hard task for them, especially since it was a lot of reading. Professor Gleason scaffolded this task though by asking the students whether they thought the review was mostly positive, negative, or mixed. She also gave them a question to keep in mind guide them to annotate: What do you agree with?

I think students liked this exercise. Though they struggled to focus on so much reading, they liked seeing that professional critics agreed with their ideas. I really liked the use of authentic reviews as well. I think students benefit from not only reading model pieces like this for content, but they also see other examples of structure, development, and style.

I am curious to see whether students use these reviews as secondary sources in their paper. I personally feel that the credibility of Roger Ebert would add some great texture and ethos to a paper and I would use it if I was writing this essay as a student. However, I think that even by the end of the semester students struggled with incorporating sources and as a result might have avoided it. To be fair, they were writing about words and images in this essay, so they had more sources than they were used to anyway.

Comments

  1. I think that many of the students did use the ideas stated in these professional reviews, and some students quoted from the reviews. I agree that students appreciated seeing their own ideas and opinions validated by professional film critics. I can see now that it really was best for students to draw their own conclusions first, and then read the reviews.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment